Transaction Search Form: please type in any of the fields below.
Date: April 29, 2024 Mon
Time: 11:39 pm
Time: 11:39 pm
Results for aggressive driving
2 results foundAuthor: Gau, Jacinta M. Title: Report of Results of the 2007 Citizen Survey. Eighth Periodic Survey of Public Attitudes Toward the Washington State Patrol: Focus on Racial Profiling and Aggressive Driving and Longitudinal Assessment, 1992 – 2007 Summary: This report is the eighth in a series of Washington State citizen assessments of the performance of the Washington State Patrol. As with the previous assessments, this survey was conducted by mail. The survey sample was selected randomly from 10 universes of potential respondents: Citizens who were cited (arrested) by the WSP; citizens to whom the WSP issued written warnings; citizens who received verbal warnings; citizens who were searched by WSP troopers; citizens who were rendered assistance by troopers; four autonomous patrol areas of high minority contacts (Kelso, Sunnyside, Highway 99, and South King County); and a random cross-section of Washington State residents. The purpose of the survey was twofold: 1) to provide the WSP with feedback concerning citizens’ current opinions and attitudes about troopers; and 2) to offer a longitudinal comparison of how those opinions and attitudes have changed over time. It should be noted that some changes have been made to the 2007 questionnaire items that may preclude a full comparison between 2007 and prior years; nevertheless, the key questions remain the same and can be used for trend analysis. In addition, the sampling procedure allows for comparisons between those who have been sanctioned by the WSP (citation, search, etc.), those who have been assisted by the WSP, and a random sample of Washington State citizens who may or may not have had recent contact with the WSP. Each survey in the series has featured a new topic area that is of interest to the WSP at the time of the survey. The featured topic area in the 2007 survey is road rage and aggressive driving. The survey contained items asking respondents to indicate the extent to which these behaviors are a problem in Washington, and to report their perceptions of the effort that WSP has invested in addressing these problems. The 2007 survey also included a question tapping citizens’ attitudes about whether or not the WSP uses driver race as a basis for making traffic stops. The inclusion of this question allows for ongoing monitoring of the public’s attitudes about the incidence of racial profiling by the WSP. Though the bulk of the survey was quantitative in nature, there was a qualitative aspect as well. Respondents had several opportunities throughout the survey to provide written elaborations on their views about road rage and aggressive driving, about their satisfaction with WSP services, about biased policing, and about other traffic- and driving-related issues. These comments were analyzed to determine if common themes emerged; that is, whether large groups of respondents wrote about the same problem(s). Ten such themes emerged from this analysis: 1) concern was expressed about road rage and aggressive or reckless driving; 2) problems were noted with semi-truck drivers; 3) concerns about under-enforcement of traffic laws by the WSP were expressed; 4) overlylenient treatment of traffic law violators by the legislature and/or courts were cited; 5) citizens’ views on WSP ticketing practices were noted (e.g., the belief that quotas guide troopers’ discretion); 6) biased policing was noted; 7) confusion regarding the WSP’s mission and function as a law enforcement agency was expressed; 8) concern was voiced regarding limited visibility and level of service that the WSP provides in areas where some people drive; 9) there was disappointment in troopers’ demeanor and respectfulness; and 10) attitudes about the professionalism and overall effectiveness of the WSP were described. The results of the content analysis will be summarized in Part 4 of this report, and the full analysis is located in Appendix B. Details: Pullman, WA: Washington State University, Division of Governmental Studies and Services, 2007. 198p. Source: Internet Resource: Accessed February 27, 2012 at: http://www.wsp.wa.gov/publications/reports/citizen07.pdf Year: 2007 Country: United States URL: http://www.wsp.wa.gov/publications/reports/citizen07.pdf Shelf Number: 124296 Keywords: Aggressive DrivingPolice-Citizen Interactions (Washington State)Public OpinionRacial ProfilingRacial Profiling in Law EnforcementRoad Rage |
Author: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety Title: Prevalence of Self-Reported Aggressive Driving Behavior: United States, 2014 Summary: The purpose of this study was to provide estimates of the prevalence of aggressive driving behaviors. The data analyzed were collected via a nationally-representative online survey of 2,705 licensed drivers aged 16 and older conducted in the United States in 2014. Background Nearly 2 in 3 U.S. drivers believe that aggressive driving is a bigger problem today than three years ago, while nine out of ten believe aggressive drivers are a serious threat to their personal safety (AAAFTS, 2015) Objective To provide estimates of the prevalence of aggressive driving behaviors Methods Survey conducted in the United States in 2014, a sample of 2,705 U.S. licensed drivers age 16 and older who reported having driven at least once in the past 30 days, weighted to reflect the U.S. population Subset of questions from AAA Foundation's Traffic Safety Culture Index Key Findings 78% of U.S. drivers reported having engaged in at least one aggressive driving behavior at least once in the past year Most common behaviors: Purposefully tailgating another vehicle (50.8%) Yelling at another driver (46.6%) Honking their horn "to show annoyance or anger" (44.5%) One-third of all respondents said that they had made an angry gesture at another driver One in four drivers reported that they had purposely tried to block another driver from changing lanes 11.9% of drivers said they had cut off another vehicle on purpose A small proportion of drivers admitted to engaging in behaviors beyond the scope of general aggressive driving and which may be considered road rage: 3.7% reported that they had exited their vehicle to confront another driver 2.8% reported that they had bumped or rammed another vehicle on purpose Male drivers were more likely than female drivers to report each of the aggressive driving behaviors examined Drivers may underreport engaging in aggressive driving behaviors due to their negative social connotation, and thus the true prevalence may be higher than the estimates reported Details: Washington, DC: The Foundation, 2016. 11p. Source: Internet Resource: Accessed April 28, 2018 at: https://aaafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Prevalence-of-Aggressive-Drivig-2014.pdf Year: 2016 Country: United States URL: https://aaafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Prevalence-of-Aggressive-Drivig-2014.pdf Shelf Number: 149956 Keywords: Aggressive DrivingDriving OffensesRoad Rage |